News By/Courtesy: Kaushal Shah | 23 Apr 2019 20:40pm IST

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Popat Bhaginath was convicted by a court for knocking off a seven year old boy, who died on the spot
  • Speed alone is not a criteria to reach to the conclusion about the rashness on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle.
  • Justice Vinay Deshpande also held that speeding a vehicle in a densely populated and busy area, would reflect the rash and negligent driving

On 19th April, 2019, the ruling was delivered by the High Court in the case of Popat Bhaginath Kasar v/s State of Maharashtra while dismissing the application of an accused who challenged his conviction and three years rigorous imprisonment punishment. He was convicted by a court for knocking off a seven year old boy, who died on the spot. The incident took place in December 2004 at the outskirts of Ahmednagar city.

The convict argued before the justice that he wasn’t driving his tempo in a rash or negligent manner. He claimed that his tempo was only speeding.  Having considered the facts, Justice Deshpande said, “Speed alone is not a criteria to reach to the conclusion about the rashness on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle. However, at the same time, it will be one of the factor as an indicator to show that the driver was driving the vehicle in most rash and negligent manner if he is unable to control the speed of the vehicle.” 

The High Court bench of Justice Vinay Deshpande also held that speeding a vehicle in a densely populated and busy area, would reflect the rash and negligent driving, on part of the driver. The bench also said that there can be no “straight jacket” formula as to what speed will be the high speed and which could be said as factor to determine the rashness.

The bench noted that the accident took place in a busy area, which was densely populated. “It is expected from a driver not to drive the vehicle at very high speed at such places. When the driver, inspite of knowing the fact that the spot of the incident is thickly populated and very busy road, still allows himself to drive the vehicle in very high speed, in my view, it will be one of the shade of driving the vehicle in rash and negligent manner,” Justice Deshpande observed.

“In this incident, had the driver at the relevant time, drove the vehicle, not in a rash and negligent manner, life of a boy, aged about seven years, could have been saved. Due to the rash and negligent act on the part of the convict, his precious life was cut­short,” Justice Deshpande observed.  The judge, accordingly, dismissed the plea filed by the convict. The Trial Court had convicted Popat Bhaginath Kasar under section 304­A and Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code. On his appeal, the appellate court acquitted him for the offence under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code, but affirmed the conviction under Section 304A IPC.

Section Editor: Shreyashi Tiwari | 23 Apr 2019 20:48pm IST


Tags : #Speeding #Bombay_HC #Rash #Negligent #Driving

Latest News

























5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice

5thvoice


Copyright Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.