News By/Courtesy: Simran Rudra | 07 Nov 2019 15:28pm IST

HIGHLIGHTS

  • The Karnataka HC has extended the stay earlier granted on the order passed by the NCLT, Bangalore which had initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd.
  • On October 25, the High Court had initially stayed the order passed by the NCLT. In an order passed on October 31, Justice B. Veerappa extended the stay till the next date of hearing.
  • The Counsel appearing for Flipkart before the High Court, argued that the NCLT has jurisdiction only in respect of debts and can only entertain cases where debts are payable.

 

The Karnataka High Court has extended the stay earlier granted on the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bangalore which had initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Flipkart India Pvt Ltd.

On October 25, the High Court had initially stayed the order passed by the NCLT. In an order passed on October 31, the Single Judge Bench of Justice B. Veerappa extended the stay till the next date of hearing.

The Counsel appearing for Flipkart before the High Court, argued that the NCLT has jurisdiction only in respect of debts and can only entertain cases where debts are payable. Since the respondent, CloudWalker Streaming Technologies, had filed a petition against Flipkart for damages, the same could not be entertained by the NCLT, the counsel contended.

CloudWalker Streaming Technologies, which is engaged in the business of import and supply of LED TVs, had moved the NCLT earlier this year for the recovery of a default amount of Rs. 26,95,00,000 from Flipkart.

The dispute arose out of a supply agreement signed in December, 2016 for import and supply of LED TVs between the two. Pursuant to the agreement, Flipkart received the first delivery of the first few batches of the LED TVs in January and March 2017, and promptly made payment for the same.

CloudWalker claimed that Flipkart inorder to gain more profits “coerced” it into offering products at a discounted rate. Since it was facing huge losses and liquidity crunch, CloudWalker agreed to it.

Demand for payment was raised by CloudWalker based on purchase order emails, to no avail.                                                                                                                                                                   

As of March, 2018, CloudWalker claimed that Flipkart had failed to collect more than 70% of the stock ordered by it, and that the company was behind payment to the tune of Rs. 55 crores.

Due to the failure of Flipkart in fulfilling its commitment, CloudWalker was forced to unload the uncollected goods at heavily discounted marked down prices just so that it could remain afloat, it was submitted.

After hearing the parties and pursuing the details of communication exchanged between them, the NCLT observed that CloudWalker imported the goods as per purchased orders made by Flipkart, which committed default.

The NCLT also noted that Flipkart had not raised any dispute with regard to the alleged deficiency in services.

The Court observed that the plea which was filed as early as on July 22 could not be kept pending any longer only for the purpose of settlement, the NCLT thus ordered initiation of CIRP against Flipkart.

The NCLT added that it is open for the parties to come with a settlement and move an application under Section 12 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Section Editor: Prithvjjit Mukherjee | 07 Nov 2019 21:12pm IST


Tags : #Karnataka High Court #Flipkart

Latest News







Copyright Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.